Secondary cities to be turned into Romania’s growth engines

26

An analysis prepared by the World Bank (WB) for the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration (MRDPA) indicates that Romania’s capital, Bucharest, and seven secondary cities – Brasov, Cluj-Napoca, Constanta, Craiova, Iasi, Ploiesti and Timisoara – are currently generating 75 percent of firm revenues in the country. But while Bucharest has already reached a productivity level comparable to those of other EU capitals, other secondary cities are behind their EU peers, a blog authored by Marius Cristea, Marcel Ionescu-Heroiu, Codruta Mare and Ciprian Moldovan, World Bank urban development specialists, reads.

“The growth pattern of the most successful ones – Cluj-Napoca, Timisoara and Iasi – are a result of a mix of demographic and economic density, accessibility to major markets, attractive universities and a fast developing service sector resulting in a sustainable growth spiral. The story is different in metropolitan areas that rely primarily on industrial sectors and have less developed ICT, financial and professional services sectors. Development there has been much more subdued, with cities attracting less new inhabitants and witnessing slower growth,” WB notes.

Strengthening Romania’s secondary cities is vital to supporting the country’s efforts in converging faster with the EU and generating sustainable, long-term growth. In turn, rapid growth comes with a set of challenges that cannot be tackled by local authorities alone.

On the one hand, urban growth requires a reinforcement of cooperation at the metropolitan level to ensure the integrated planning and provision of public services, such as transport. This is an area that is poorly regulated in Romania.

On the other hand, the investment needs of the secondary cities exceed the financial resources available at the local level. For example, Cluj-Napoca – a city that attracts over 50,000 commuters every day – needs to invest approximately EUR 600 million in metropolitan transport infrastructure by 2030. The city’s total investment budget in 2016 was, however, only EUR 75 million in 2016, after reaching a peak of EUR 112 million in 2014.

“The appropriate use of EU financing instruments, including the Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI), are needed to unleash the growth potential of secondary cities in Romania, which face very similar challenges – ranging from public transport, housing, education, green and public spaces, to leisure and entertainment facilities, and social inclusion. A one-size-fits-all approach will likely prove inefficient,” WB urban development specialists show.

Flexibility in prioritizing investment needs – using the framework of a realistic operational budget – should guide decisions for urban stakeholders.

Seven of Romania’s secondary cities received EU funding in the amount of EUR 600 million from 2007-2013 – resulting in major improvements in public infrastructure and services and encouraging greater productivity and internal migration. Nonetheless, most of these investment projects were concentrated in city centers and failed to support the integration of the greater metropolitan areas into a coherent, functional and growth-oriented urban ecosystem.

Now is the time to correct this by building a broader, integrated metropolitan approach to developing a sustainable network of competitive secondary cities in Romania, WB urban development specialists concluded.

- Advertisement -

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More