“The Americans Are Coming!”: Atlantic and Pacific Social and Cultural Paradigms

4 2,705

by Tiberiu Dianu

 

  1. When Are the Americans Coming?

This has been an interrogation on a societal level, shaped as an outcry for freedom in the post-1945 period. It encompasses a horizon of high, albeit immaterialized, expectations, turned subsequently into a depository of unfulfilled sentiments, passed from generation to generation in the form of some actions motivated by hope and/or frustration.

We have identified two regional dimensions:

– (1) In the (north) Atlantic area, present in some countries, allied militarily with the United States, in Europe (particularly in the eastern part); and

– (2) In the (south) Pacific area, detected by anthropologists at some populations in Oceania.

Each of these cultural paradigms presents strategic implications.

  1. The Atlantic Paradigm

In Eastern Europe, the expectations for an American arrival were taking shapes since the Allied invasion of Normandy, on June 6, 1944. But in spring 1945, when the American and Russian armies were advancing toward Berlin from opposite directions, several Eastern European nations got caught in between the games of interests of these two main actors. This was due to a previous U.S.-Soviet Union agreement establishing a certain demarcation line in the front zone.

In the Czech Republic, the anti-German resistance members of the Prague Uprising (May 5 to May 8, 1945) could not persuade the U.S. Army to intervene, although their units were just 12 miles away and able to capture the city in several hours. American politicians (in the Harry S. Truman administration) and generals (like Omar Bradley) – fearing they would anger their Soviet ally – forced their military to play a passive role, and did not allow general George Patton to take over Prague, although he was wanted and expected there by the majority of the population (except for the pro-Soviet sympathizers).

In Romania (initially, an Axis member), after the country switched sides to the Allies on August 23, 1944, the population’s unfulfilled expectations — to be liberated by American troops from both Nazi Germany and Communist Russia — had a more dramatic turn of events. Anti-communist guerrilla fighters, led by former Royal army officers, were able to operate somewhat effectively in the Carpathian Mountains against the Soviet Red Army, who had occupied the country, throughout the entire late-1940s to early-1960s period.

But even after that, mixed feelings of hope and frustration continued to persist until after the fall of communism in 1989.

The “non-arrival of Americans” — both during the post-1945 and post-1989 periods – has been a theme generously exploited by the local movie industry, and rewarded with awards at the international film festivals.

  1. The Pacific Paradigm

The same phenomenon has taken place for the nations of Oceania (and especially in Melanesia).These unfulfilled expectations have partly surfaced in the form of cargo cults.

Initially, cargo cults appeared as a synthesis of local and foreign elements, involving help from the ancestors and abundance of goods. Later on – especially during and post-World War II era – Pacific cults were associated with (mostly) the U.S. military equipment and supplies airdropped to troops and islanders, which drastically changed the lifestyle of the latter.

After 1945, the American military abandoned the airbases and stopped dropping cargos, causing the local leaders to develop cults promising deliverance of goods as gifts from their ancestors or other sources.

The sentiment of nostalgia has been extremely intense ever since, making the cult members to mimic some U.S. soldiers’ routines, like military parades, drills, and landing signals.

Cargo cults originated in Fiji (the “Tuka Movement” in 1885).

Cargo cults (or some manifestations misidentified as “cargo cults”) are still active in countries like Vanuatu, Papua New Guinea, and elsewhere in Oceania. Among them, we mention:

– (1) The “John Frum (America)” cult (in Vanuatu)

– (2) The Johnson cult (in Papua New Guinea).

4. Strategic Implications

Obviously, all these manifestations of sympathy for American values and military personnel must be commended and appreciated for their loyalty and durability throughout time. Apparently, pro-American attitudes in Eastern Europe have been a constant in the area since the early 1920s.

Consequently, these (particularly Eastern) European front nations need to be encouraged and rewarded accordingly – before they do not turn again to bitter frustrations – by engaging them more actively against the current Russian expansionism toward West and the Atlantic.

On their part, the populations in Oceania have been exhibiting constant pro-American attitudes, basically since the 1898 Spanish-American War.

Therefore, the current American administration should envision them into a renewed construction (particularly the current U.S. territories and the COFA nations).

This renewed construction should be geared to neutralize the increasing Chinese and Russian expansions toward East and the Pacific.

 

Tiberiu Dianu has published several books and a host of articles in law, politics, and post-communist societies. He currently lives and works in Washington, DC, and can be followed on MEDIUM.

- Advertisement -

4 Comments
  1. MARCELA DESCULTU says

    The fact of the matter is that nations in East Europe and Oceania, which are US allies, should be further encouraged in their pro-American endeavors, so that limiting the Russian-Chinese expansion be more efficient.

  2. MARCELA DESCULTU says

    The focus of the article is on the idea of Pacific-Atlantic solidarity through America against the expansion of two super-powers, Russia and China. This is an original idea on the market for which the author deserves wholeheartedly congratulations.

  3. DANIELA says

    The Americans’ arrival in East Europe would have helped tremendously. During the 1945 Prague Revolution, the US military was persuaded for non-intervention due to their prior agreement with the Soviet Union. In Oceania, the same, the US pulled the military out after 1945. America’s role and presence in the world is extremely important.

  4. DANIELA says

    In Oceania, the same, the US pulled the military out after 1945. America’s role and presence in the world is extremely important.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More