EU changes rules on GM crop cultivation


Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

The EU has given governments more power to decide whether to plant genetically modified (GM) crops, which are highly restricted in Europe, the BBC reports.

The European Parliament has passed a new law giving states more flexibility by a big majority.

A type of maize – MON 810 – is the only GM crop grown commercially in the EU.

Although Euro MPs and ministers have agreed to give states more flexibility, EU scientists will still play a key role in authorisations.

GM crops are used widely in the US and Asia, but many Europeans are wary of their impact on health and wildlife. It is one of the toughest issues at the EU-US talks on a free trade deal, as farming patterns in Europe – including GM use – differ greatly from North America.

The new law only applies to crops and does not cover GM used in animal feed, which can still enter the human food chain indirectly.

Last July the new EU Commission President, Jean-Claude Juncker, said the legal changes were necessary because under current rules “the Commission is legally obliged to authorise the import and processing of new GMOs [genetically modified organisms], even in cases where a clear majority of member states are opposed to their use”.

Spain is by far the biggest grower of MON 810 in Europe, with 137,000 hectares (338,000 acres), the European Commission says.

Yet the EU total for MON 810 is just 1.56% of the EU’s total maize-growing area.

MON 810 is marketed by US biotech giant Monsanto and is modified to be resistant to the European corn borer, a damaging insect pest.

The maize variety is banned in Austria, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary and Luxembourg.

Under the new law, the grounds for a ban on any GM variety will be expanded. National governments will in future be able to cite factors such as protection of a particular ecosystem or the high cost of GM contamination for conventional farmers.

The new law says states can only use environmental grounds that are “complementary” to Efsa’s assessments of GM crops.


- Advertisement -

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More